Here is a video from Wayne DeFrancesco analyzing Mike Maves (aka Sevam1?S) swing. While I think the video is exciting, I suppose that DeFrancesco can also have neglected the point that Maves has made approximately his swing from Day 1, he calls it a aggregate of Ben Hogan and Moe Norman?S swing mechanics. In reality, Mike has frequently been noted through the nickname ?Moegan.?
Furthermore, in my time talking with Mike personally and reading his paintings, he does no longer simply shoot down golfing teachers paintings as ?Being too complicated.? He has shot down some commonplace theories like the ?Flat spine? And the ?Chin up? At address. However, he?S been very complimentary of other instructors as properly. I know he has taken a eager hobby towards TGM and other swing philosophies due to the fact he has been very complimentary about them and inquired about them in our conversations.
Now, he has acted like Hogan?S ?Five Lessons: Modern Fundamentals of Golf? Ebook is the gospel. And he has been vital of a few instructors and a few instructors being too complicated. However, I do now not see him pigeonholing all golfing teachers that do not observe his theories as being that way. More regularly than now not, I can't say that for different instructors who communicate about golfing instructors who do no longer subscribe to the identical theories.
Either manner, I nevertheless suppose the comparisons and contrasts between the Hogan and Maves? Swing is thrilling. But, I think some of the peripheral thoughts approximately Mike as someone and what he says are often misinformed hyperbole.
3JACK
0 comments