You can think about modern day tip because the flip facet of Thursday's tip. Martin Hall pointed out how grip impacts your tendency to hook the ball; in modern day video Kirk Jones talks about how grip impacts all club movement.
While Martin talked about creating a extra impartial hand function, Kirk suggests why you need to pay attention to HOW you operate that hand position.
Even with a very good grip to create a desired clubface function, you could alter that clubface if you get sloppy along with your wrist motion. Cupping your lead wrist can open the maximum impartial clubface, whilst rolling your path quit your lead hand (also known as bowing the wrist) can close the face down.
Kirk additionally mentions exaggerating your wrist cock. That contributes to both issues, depending on whether you cup or bow your wrist to create more cock throughout your swing.
The irony here is -- and I recognise some teachers will disagree with me but it's real -- you can play proper golf with a bowed wrist and you can additionally play top golfing with a cupped wrist. Just look at the history of our game and you may discover awesome gamers who used both of these positions at the top in their swings.
The key here is consistency. If you bow your wrist, you need to keep it bowed the same amount throughout your swing. The same is true of cupping. It's when you use a cupped (or bowed) grip at address, bow (or cup) it on the way back and then try to square the face at impact that you get into trouble. For example, DJ bows his wrist during his backswing and then maintains that bow all the way through impact. That makes him a fairly consistent driver despite his length.
Finally, I shouldn't have to say this but I will: Obviously you want to avoid the extremes. A slight bow or a slight cup is pretty easy to maintain throughout your swing; exaggerated cups and bows like Kirk shows in the video are recipes for disaster. Find your most natural position and maintain it throughout your swing, and you'll be surprised at how much more consistent you'll be.
0 comments