I?M working on probably tweaking my Driving Effectiveness set of rules.
While my Driving Effectiveness algorithm has a reasonably sturdy correlation to Adjusted Scoring Average, if I can tweak it to create a constantly stronger correlation I will do it. This will imply a better representation of what is going into riding the ball most successfully.
The metric I?M toying with now and trying to upload to the algorithm is the proportion of drives that pass over the green and the tough (fairway bunkers, O.B., risks, trees, and so on). Right now I even have an algorithm that represents a pretty stronger correlation coefficient than my modern Driving Effectiveness method. However, this is most effective primarily based on the 2012 season.
I could want to test those over for as a minimum the beyond five years and if I get a stronger mathematical correlation, I will make the adjustments to the set of rules.
Anyway, here is what I have for the pinnacle-20 in 2012 with this experimental formulation. Their ratings in Driving Effectiveness for 2012 (cutting-edge formulation) are in parentheses:
1. Hunter Mahan (three)
2. Bubba Watson (1)
3. Tiger Woods (39)
4. Louis Oosthuizen (14)
5. Charl Schwartzel (fifty nine)
6. Rory McIlroy (2)
7. Charlie Beljan (four)
eight. John Senden (25)
9. Adam Scott (12)
10. John Huh (eleven)
eleven. Graeme McDowell (7)
12. Boo Weekley (five)
thirteen. Roberto Castro (30)
14. David Toms (57)
15. Kyle Stanley (15)
sixteen. Justin Rose (23)
17. Keegan Bradley (10)
18. Bo Van Pelt (17)
19. Tim Clark (37)
20. Dustin Johnson (24)
Biggest Decline: Brendan Steele (119th from 54th) & Kevin Na (154th from 89th)
Biggest Improvement: William McGirt (72nd from 136th) I am continuing to work on this. Hopefully this will give a more accurate representation of what is needed for ALL golfers to drive the ball better. I will update my status on this when new developments arise. 3JACK Read more: http://richie3jack.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=blog&action=display&thread=4126#ixzz2NHb2IUxq
0 comments